Friday, June 30, 2006

What is Melanie Morgan's email address?

Planning to write Melanie Morgan and complain about her calling for the hanging of editors? Be advised she really doesn't care what you think. (audio link)

Here is Melanie Morgan's email address: melaniemorgan @ abc-sf.com

Since she said most of her emails are from liberal nuts, copy ol' Spocko and I'll publish a few here, I doubt you are all nuts, maybe just her supporters. spockosemail @ gmail.com

And don't bother to write Jack Swanson, the Operations Director at KSFO either. He is her husband. You probably won't have any luck writing KSFO's President, Michael "Mickey" Luckoff either. He developed the KSFO Hot Talk Format and protected and supported Michael Savage during his reign at KSFO.

You might want to write John Hare at ABC Radio, but since he hasn't fired Brian Sussman for calling for the death of 10 million Muslims, demanding a caller "Say Allah is a whore" or discussing cutting off an Iraqi's finger and then their penis, you might not have much luck with him either. I guess they are waiting for something REALLY offensive or someone REALLY important to complain.

IF you do write ABC Radio (currently owned by Disney) here are some emails.

John Hare, President ABC Radio
john . hare @ abc . com

Mike Connolly, SVP sales
Michael . t. connolly @ abc . com

John Rosso, SVP Affiliate Relations and Business Administration
john . rosso @ abc . com

I do encourage you to write the advertisers at KSFO. I've been writing the advertisers on Brian Sussman's show (Morgan's sometimes co-host in the morning) to point out his outrageous statements.

A FEW POSITIVE WORDS

Quite a few smart advertisers don't want to support this kind of speech once they are aware of it. It just doesn't match their view of themselves. Of special note as a GREAT former advertiser is Bank of America. After hearing what Sussman was saying they pulled ALL their advertising from KSFO. Good for them. Most recently Mastercard pulled their ads from Sussman's show. I also want to acknowledge the good people at Borders Books, and Wendi Friesen at wendi.com the wonderful clinical hypnotherapist who doesn't like to be associated with this kind of talk either. Maybe Morgan should listen to some of her anger management tapes!


I don't track all the advertisers on Morgan's show, but here are two to get you started that I know about because another of Morgan's co-hosts, Officer Vic, read the ads on the air.

Chase Visa. Write Visa International. Write the people in charge of advertising.

Write Chevrolet not only about Morgan, but because they mock Chevy.

What is astonishing is not only do the hosts call for the death of editors and Muslims, they also MOCK THEIR OWN ADVERTISERS.

Now maybe it's just me, but when one of the hosts calls the cars that Chevy makes SHITTY, ON THE AIR, (audio link) I would think twice about advertising on that show. All morning they were calling the Spare the Air program "Scare the Air" and talking about activities to pollute the environment. Sussman of course mocks Chevrolet/GMs environmental goals by lumping them in with polluting leaf blowers. I'm sure Elizabeth A. Lowery, GM Vice President, Environment and Energy really doesn't appreciate her cars being categorized as polluters.

Ed Peper -- Chevrolet general manager

ed . peper @ gm . com

Brent Dewar -- GM North America Vice President, Field Sales Service and Parts

w. w. brent.dewar @ gm . com

Roderick D. Gillum -- GM Vice President, Corporate Responsibility and Diversity

roderick . d. gillum @ gm . com

Elizabeth A. Lowery -- GM Vice President, Environment and Energy

elizabeth . a. lowery @ gm . com

Steven J. Harris -- GM Vice President, Global Communications

steven . j. harris @ gm . com

Michael A. Jackson -- GM North America Vice President, Marketing and Advertising

michael . a . jackson @ gm . com

Megan Stooke-- Director, Advertising & Sales Promotion Chevrolet

megan . stooke @ gm . com


(Hey, the "Chevy = Shitty" audio clip during the WSJ segment is a twofer! Write the FCC about this one! Especially Pat who emailed Morgan and was mocked by Morgan for what she said in the paper. This will be one way to wipe that smug grin off her face as she ridicules you for being offended by her comments.)

Please copy ol' Spocko with your letters at spockosemail @ gmail.com


My guess is ABC won't care until the revenue drops by 70%. Why? Because then it might impact the selling price that Citadel pays for buying the station. If I was Farid Suleman I'd demand a discount on a station that isn't performing.

Oh, and ABC folks, I've told you time and time again that you need to reign in or fire these people and that it will cost you if you don't.

Remember those new FCC rules and fines that the Republican congress just passed and that Bush signed into law? Well Officer Vic isn't going to have to pay the potential $315,000 fine for swearing. YOU ARE. Now I'm guessing that he won't get a $315,000 fine, but since there are never any consequences for the hosts, they don't care if they put a dent in your bottom line with future fines.

BTW, I just heard what "getting into trouble" is for the hosts. Sussman is referring to the email he gets! Well NOW I understand. I guess that means, no written warnings from his co-host's husband, no financial hits from Mickey Luckoff. So clearly they have no incentive to change as long as the ratings comes in the door. It must be those Unions that Sussman hates so much that are protecting him. He should get on his knees and thank that vengeful gun toting god he has created for his union contract lawyer!

Finally, since none of these people have "gotten into trouble" for their transgressions, you have no one to blame but yourselves when advertisers leave or fines come. Sorry, I tried to warn you. Don't blame the messenger. (But I know you will, it's what you do.)

14 Comments:

Anonymous said...

Are you in the building at 900 Front St? The SFPD and FBI are investigating you.


A prison cell for the New York Times
Posted: June 30, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

My life has been twisted by a giant whirlwind this week.

It all began on Monday. The producers for the MSNBC news program "Hardball with Chris Matthews" had asked me to come on their show to discuss the leaking of classified anti-terrorism programs by the New York Times.

I was informed that I would be on with Matthews and Al Sharpton, which sparked two thoughts in my head.

1. Why is it always the "mainstream media's" belief that "fair and balanced" means putting on one conservative to counter a liberal host plus a liberal guest?

2. I hadn't seen much of Al Sharpton in the news since his voyage down to Crawford, Texas, to sit in a ditch with Cindy Sheehan and demand that the U.S. surrender to Islamic terrorist groups so as to stop the casualties among American troops in the war on terrorism.



I made it clear with my very first words that I saw this as a case of treason. Yes, for those of you in the "cut and run" crowd, I said TREASON. (You can see the video of this segment for yourself.)

Matthews was shocked. He seemed to think he misunderstood me. I couldn't have really meant that, could I? Long prison sentences for reporters because they repeatedly leaked classified information on America's efforts to combat terrorism?

Absolutely.

Since my comments on Monday, a growing chorus of patriotic Americans have joined in the call for prosecution of the New York Times for committing treason.

New York Times editor Bill Keller and his accomplices should face prosecution by the government of the United States for willfully and repeatedly undermining the war effort against terrorism by repeatedly violating the law and reporting on classified anti-terrorism programs.

For those with short memories, the New York Times pulled the same stunt in December of last year when it exposed the terrorist wiretapping program to the world under the sensational headline, "Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts."

In each of the cases where the New York Times leaked information on our efforts to battle America's enemies, the Bush administration made pleas for the Times not to publish the stories.

In May of 2006, Keller wrote an angry letter to the Wall Street Journal in which he insisted that the framers of the Constitution intended for reporters to be able to undermine the nation's war effort without fear of prosecution, in order to "protect a vibrant, inquisitive press."

As Ann Coulter asked in her weekly column, "When is the New York Times going to get around to uncovering an al-Qaida secret program?"

That question sums up the entire problem here. The reason that the Times continues to expose America's secrets in the war against terrorism is because the New York Times is rooting for the other side to win. Whether it is because of their personal hatred of President Bush, or if it is simply a reflexive response because of their anti-war editorial bias, the Times is against the U.S. military and wants to see our troops fail.

If you think I'm blowing things out of proportion, then try looking at it this way. After Ann Coulter wrote just a few sentences in one book about her displeasure with four 9-11 widows who were guilty of truly vile conduct that hurt America's fight against terrorism, the entire liberal media establishment condemned and vilified Coulter. Legislators in New Jersey sought to have Coulter's book banned in the state.

Hmmm … let's review this dichotomy.

Ann Coulter supports the missions of our troops. She wants to see the Islamic terrorist networks dealt with in a forceful and successful manner. She cheers on the men and women of the United States military when they make progress in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Yet the media and anti-war activists find her disgusting and try to silence her.

The New York Times, in contrast, has repeatedly attempted to hurt the American war effort. Their editors and reporters attack U.S. policies at the terrorist holding facilities in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and at Abu Ghraib. Their news stories expose America's secret efforts to track and stop terrorists through wiretapping of their phones and monitoring their financial activities.

The media, and the Times in particular, are doing things that are helping the Islamic terrorists to kill and maim both U.S. troops and innocent American civilians. The press tries to brush this off as no big deal, but it's time for them to be held accountable for their atrocious conduct.

Liberal newspapers have every right to print offensive editorials advancing a far-left political agenda. They do not have the right to reveal classified information that aids America's enemies in a time of war.

When and if they do it is called TREASON.

And it's time for the editors of the New York Times to be prosecuted for committing treason and understanding full well the consequences of their actions.

It's time to put Bill Keller and his anti-military compatriots at the New York Times in a prison cell for a long, long time.

7:38 PM  
spocko said...

Dear Anonymous:
I really don't know what you are on about. Please adjust your medication.
Spocko

8:09 PM  
PTCruiser said...

HA! Outstanding job, Spocko. I particularly love the pictures of the psychotic hag and the two monkeys below her. Woohoo!

6:00 AM  
betmo said...

ok- kind of off topic on that comment. anyway, i stopped by to thank you for actually doing something and backing up your words with citizen action. we can take back america from the crazies and fringes- and corporation. we have the power of the pocketbook- and really isn't that what america is all about? again, thank you.

6:40 AM  
spocko said...

Thanks Betmo! I want you to know I really appreciate you as a reader. I'm not getting paid to do this (but the crazies are! What a planet you have here.) and comments from people like you mean a lot.


LLAP,
Spocko

8:27 AM  
The Kenosha Kid said...

Someone just reached my blog after googling "eschacon philadelphia spocko." Do you know anyone in San Rafael, CA?

1:43 PM  
Interrobang said...

Spocko, I just saw your comment at Echidne's from two minutes ago. That was brilliant, and you've really been doing heroic work on the subject. Sorry to steal your thunder re Melanie Morgan the other day on the thread at Eschaton, but someone had to put up that SourceWatch bio excerpt.

BTW, the streetcar manuscript has been held up, due to my publisher's not having his crap together. *sigh*

12:16 AM  
Nancy Marie said...

I remember back in the day when Morgan was at KGO we used to call her Mellanie Moron. She was as insipid then as she is now. She was always trying to get her little two cents in. It was not until she married her powerful hubby that she got her two cents in and and tried to turn it into something worth hearing. She was always in the back ground at KGO being the cheerleader to that Jimbo she now cohorts with. I think that time of such impotence really stuck in her craw and now that she has some lime light she is going at it with both barrells so she wont be drowned out again. As far as her radio voice goes, it is so nasely as to be unbearable. She has no commen sense. And no sense of dignity. She never has and never will. She is just clawing her way to the top.
How can she call for the death of someone?
She is obviously taking her que from another great christian Pat Robertson. This kind of statemet is the only way, beside the help of her husband, that she will ever make any kind of a name for herself.In her mind any kind of notariaty will suffice.

11:56 AM  
Anonymous said...

I remember back in the day when Morgan was at KGO we used to call her Mellanie Moron. She was as insipid then as she is now. She was always trying to get her little two cents in. It was not until she married her powerful hubby that she got her two cents in and and tried to turn it into something worth hearing. She was always in the back ground at KGO being the cheerleader to that Jimbo she now cohorts with. I think that time of such impotence really stuck in her craw and now that she has some lime light she is going at it with both barrells so she wont be drowned out again. As far as her radio voice goes, it is so nasely as to be unbearable. She has no commen sense. And no sense of dignity. She never has and never will. She is just clawing her way to the top.
How can she call for the death of someone?
She is obviously taking her que from another great christian Pat Robertson. This kind of statemet is the only way, beside the help of her husband, that she will ever make any kind of a name for herself.In her mind any kind of notariaty will suffice.

11:56 AM  
Anonymous said...

I remember back in the day when Morgan was at KGO we used to call her Mellanie Moron. She was as insipid then as she is now. She was always trying to get her little two cents in. It was not until she married her powerful hubby that she got her two cents in and and tried to turn it into something worth hearing. She was always in the back ground at KGO being the cheerleader to that Jimbo she now cohorts with. I think that time of such impotence really stuck in her craw and now that she has some lime light she is going at it with both barrells so she wont be drowned out again. As far as her radio voice goes, it is so nasely as to be unbearable. She has no commen sense. And no sense of dignity. She never has and never will. She is just clawing her way to the top.
How can she call for the death of someone?
She is obviously taking her que from another great christian Pat Robertson. This kind of statemet is the only way, beside the help of her husband, that she will ever make any kind of a name for herself.In her mind any kind of notariaty will suffice.

11:57 AM  
Nancy Marie said...

I remember back in the day when Morgan was at KGO we used to call her Mellanie Moron. She was as insipid then as she is now. She was always trying to get her little two cents in. It was not until she married her powerful hubby that she got her two cents in and and tried to turn it into something worth hearing. She was always in the back ground at KGO being the cheerleader to that Jimbo she now cohorts with. I think that time of such impotence really stuck in her craw and now that she has some lime light she is going at it with both barrells so she wont be drowned out again. As far as her radio voice goes, it is so nasely as to be unbearable. She has no commen sense. And no sense of dignity. She never has and never will. She is just clawing her way to the top.
How can she call for the death of someone?
She is obviously taking her que from another great christian Pat Robertson. This kind of statment is the only way, beside the help of her husband, that she will ever make any kind of a name for herself. In her mind any kind of notariaty will suffice.

11:58 AM  
Joan said...

I've been listening to Melanie Morgan for a year and I think she is getting more and more aggressive and outrageous. Maybe she wants to be a poor woman's Ann Coulter.

1:55 AM  
Anonymous said...

Why not post her address?

http://antiprotester.blogspot.com/2006/07/where-does-pinch-sulzberger-live.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/02/national/02chicago.html?ex=1267506000&%2338;en=de932e7af25fb46b&%2338;ei=5088&

11:32 AM  
Anonymous said...

I can't edit that attempt at a joke, but trying to finish...

for more on the trend of personal intimidation see "The thug and intimidation tactics of the Far Right go mainstream"
http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/07/thug-and-intimidation-tactics-of-far.html

11:36 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home